Is Pence (the Traitor) Lying About His Jan. 6 Decision !!!, 4159
Stillreport: On January 6, 2021, a group of Republican members of Congress, raised objections to the certification of the electoral college results for the 2020 presidential election. These members believed that there were significant concerns regarding the election’s integrity and wanted a 10-day stay in the certification process to allow the state legislatures to examine the newly-evolving evidence of election fraud and potentially, reconsider their electoral vote distributions. The core argument put forward by these members can be summarized as follows:
Election Irregularities
They pointed to massive election irregularities in several states during the 2020 presidential election. These claims ranged from concerns about the handling of mail-in ballots; the issue of poll observers not being granted proper access to oversee the vote-counting process, and security camera video evidence of counterfeit ballots being run through tabulators after all poll watchers were hustled out of the counting area. Completely ignored was the truck driver who reported that he drove 250,000 pre-marked ballots from Long Island, New York to Harrisburg, Pennsylvania, the state capital, on election day.
State Legislatures’ Authority
The so-called insurrectionists emphasized the constitutional authority of state legislatures to regulate the way presidential electors are chosen. According to this argument, the Constitution grants state legislatures the primary responsibility for determining the rules for appointing presidential electors, and if they believed that the election process had been compromised, they had the power to reevaluate the results.
According to Senator Josh Hawley, a Republican from Missouri, “I objected to the votes of the state of Pennsylvania … because they didn’t follow their own laws.”
Preserving Election Integrity
The members who raised objections believed that sending the results back to the state legislatures would help maintain public confidence in the electoral process. They argued that a more thorough examination of the alleged irregularities and any potential legislative action taken by the state legislatures would help ensure the integrity of future elections.
Constitutional Concerns
Some members expressed concerns about the potential precedent of allowing alleged irregularities to go unaddressed. They believed that by not thoroughly examining these claims, it could set a troubling precedent for future elections, undermining the democratic process. And where else would the founders have suggested that this evidence be fully exposed and a remedy proposed? And that is exactly the situation we find ourselves in today. It seems that nothing in the 5 battleground states has been changed over the past 2-1/2 years. In Georgia, for example, an expert report by Prof. J. Alex Halderman, Ph.D and Prof. Drew Springall, Ph.D was finally released by a federal court in mid-June but this report was written two years ago! It showed that these Dominion voting machin
